| To get the highest ROI on
new products, look beyond countable performance measures to some that seem
uncountable. The ROI impact of development speed, agility, and innovation
can be as big as that of product performance and development cost. |
April, 2004
Improving R&D Results: Count on the
Uncountable
by John Farnbach
|
| In managing
R&D to achieve business results, it’s easy to see how countable goals,
such as new product specifications and development cost, impact ROI. But
to get the highest return from your R&D effort, take a look at some
performance factors you may be overlooking because they seem uncountable.
How would your business improve if your R&D program were faster and
more agile in bringing innovative products to market with dependable schedules?
For example, what if your release dates
never slipped? First, you’d avoid disappointing the customers who trusted
your delivery promises. And more importantly, as your reputation for dependable
delivery grew, you’d be able to lock customers in sooner, getting even
farther ahead of your competitors.
R&D goals fall into five categories,
or performance dimensions: Product attributes, development cost,
response time, R&D delivery, and innovation. Not all of these are easily
quantified, but they all impact business results. Don’t make the mistake
of managing only the countable dimensions.
|
|
Don’t
make the mistake of managing only the countable dimensions.
|
Product
attribute and development cost are
the dimensions that are easiest to quantify and the first ones that get
attention when companies focus on business results. Product attributes
are the design goals for a new product, including specifications, features,
and quality, as well as manufacturing and support costs. Estimating the
financial impact of product attributes on revenue and profit is straightforward. |
| Development
cost is, of course, the easiest dimension to quantify. But it’s important
to realize that reducing cost does not always increase ROI: If reducing
cost means that you sacrifice performance in other dimensions, ROI can
suffer. Companies focused exclusively on cost and efficiency often under
staff projects, leading to slow and unreliable schedules.
So now you’re developing competitive
products at reasonable cost—where else can you turn to improve R&D
performance? Take a look at the other dimensions.
Response time has a far-reaching
impact on business results because each product opportunity has a life
cycle that is fixed in absolute time. Factors outside of your control,
such as new technologies, competitive developments, or shifting customer
needs, determine when a market need emerges and when the opportunity is
no longer viable.
If you can recognize a need, define
a product, and release it sooner in the opportunity life cycle, your product’s
sales will ramp faster to higher levels and enjoy longer life to achieve
much higher returns. Fast response time also feeds a self-reinforcing cycle
that makes your company agile in the market, since completing one project
sooner means you can respond more quickly to the next opportunity.
OK, response time has a big impact
on R&D performance, but aren’t your new product teams already working
as fast as they can? In fact, most companies have two ways they can cut
response time: First, recognize opportunities sooner; then apply more resources
to each project. If response time is important, take a look at opportunity
scouting and project resources.
R&D delivery performance
means reliable release dates and dependable early product shipments, which
impact business results by building customer confidence in your new products.
Again, this effect is hard to count, but powerful. If you’ve resigned yourself
to living with chronic schedule slips and painful early product shipments,
ask your sales force what their jobs would be like if suddenly you could
release and ship new products on schedule. They wouldn’t have to deal with
irate customers and could lock sales in sooner because customers would
believe your delivery promises.
If you can combine dependable R&D
delivery with fast response time, you gain a compound advantage. You can
spot an opportunity sooner, release a solution more quickly, and lock customers
in even before you release the product. This combination leaves slower,
less agile competitors hopelessly behind.
If your R&D delivery could be better,
take a look at the most common limitations—spreading resources too thinly
across too many projects and discovering problems or new requirements late
in a project.
Innovation is a critical
business driver for all technology companies, but as a dimension of R&D
performance, it’s not as straightforward as you’d think. Innovation is
a disorderly force that conflicts with the other performance dimensions.
An innovative new product technology, for example, can make schedules long
and unreliable. If not balanced against other R&D goals, runaway innovation
can devastate R&D returns. |
Because innovation is fundamentally
chaotic, companies often implement management practices intended to limit
the chaos, with the effect of inhibiting innovation. An excessive focus
on achieving established plans, for example, can lead to rigidly evaluating
people against year-old objectives, which discourages unexpected innovations. |
Above
all, beware of symptomatic cures for fundamental problems.
|
If you feel that a higher level of
innovation would improve your business results, look for ways to
update management practices to increase your tolerance for chaotic new
ideas.
Improving R&D performance
isn’t easy. You have to look beyond countable goals to factors
that are harder to measure, but nonetheless have significant impact on
business results. This takes not only a sensitivity to uncountable factors
but also good organizational communications to manage them effectively.
Above all, beware of symptomatic cures
for fundamental problems. If you simply apply management pressure to shorten
schedules, for example, you may get unrealistic plans that can’t be met
or find teams cutting corners to finish the project sooner. To make lasting
improvements, you have to find the fundamental causes that limit performance
and correct them.
(For further reading,
see Leading Product Innovation by Marvin L. Patterson and
John A. Fenoglio, published by John Wiley and Sons) |
|
Give us your opinion.
We're happy to discuss these
ideas with you. Email us by clicking this link
and inserting the ID "info" in the address. (This helps us avoid SPAM.)
This article was published
in Silver Nuggets -
The R&D Management Newsletter.
To subscribe to future issues, click
here and insert the ID "nuggets" in the address. |
|
|