| How much more productive
would your company's operations be if communication worked better?
The upfront effort spent focusing on the intended results of your messages
can yield enormous payback in communication efficiency and business results. |
August, 2004
Efficient Communication: Better Results
with Less Time and Effort
By Mary Wilson Callahan
|
The cost of poor communication to
a company’s operations can be staggering. Think of the negative financial
impact of
-
Ambiguous product specifications
-
Misunderstood customer expectations
-
Differing views about what strategies
or plans were decided upon
-
Decisions based on confusing information
-
Time wasted in meetings that do not accomplish
their objectives
And it doesn’t stop there. Ripple effects
compound the problem, costing more money, wasting more time, and straining
internal and external working relationships.
So much is written and taught about
the importance -- and the difficulty -- of effective communication in business,
as in life. However, let’s focus for the moment on efficiency in communication.
How much more productive would your company’s operations be if messages
– whether written, spoken, or unspoken – were transmitted and acted upon
correctly the first time? Furthermore, why isn’t this happening right now?
|
| Focus
on the person you want to receive the message. |
The principal
culprit in inefficient communications is that people concentrate on what
they want to say. In fact, they should focus on the person they want
to receive the message. The true purpose of business communication is to
change or expand what the receiver understands and/or to cause the receiver
to take some action. When you work from the premise that communication
is an interchange -- as much |
about the receiver
as it is about the sender -- additional factors must be considered in framing
your message, including
-
Is the receiver equipped to understand
the message that I send? Do we have a shared vocabulary, and do the words
and symbols mean the same to both of us?
-
Do I have the receiver’s attention? What
external or internal "noise" might be interfering with this communication?
-
Do my words, implications, and gestures
capitalize on the recipient’s usual way (or style) of receiving and being
influenced by information?
-
Does my message address and resolve any
conflicts that it may raise with other messages that the receiver has received?
-
Does the receiver have the authority,
motivation, and skills to take the desired action?
|
Only when the answer to these questions
is "Yes" can you be assured that the receiver will get your message, and
it will indeed be what you wanted to say.
Here are several guidelines for improving
the efficiency of communication in your company:
|
You’ll
be more successful by addressing the overall environment in which business
communication takes place.
|
1. Recognize that instead
of trying to "fix" every point-to-point communication channel, you’ll be
more successful by addressing the overall environment in which business
communication takes place.
2. Communication slow-downs
and errors are reduced when the corporate vision, mission, strategy, objectives,
and values are widely known, well understood, and mutually consistent.
In addition, the behavior of the leadership team must be consistent with
the company’s vision and values.
3. When the knowledge and skill
to take action are matched with the authority to decide and act, both the
clarity and efficiency of communication increase.
4. An active working knowledge
of different communication styles and preferences will boost communication
efficiency.
Right now, you may be thinking that improving
communication in your organization will be a lengthy and difficult job
-- but recognize that it is almost impossible to overstate the value of
good communications.
Attention to a few key points can make
big improvements in both communication efficiency and communication effectiveness,
as well as in company performance. In some areas, quick corrective action,
like training in communication styles, is available. Other areas may require
a more sustained effort, but the objective, the path, and the payoff will
be clear. |
|
Give us your opinion.
We're happy to discuss these
ideas with you. Email us by clicking this link
and inserting the ID "info" in the address. (This helps us avoid SPAM.)
This article was published
in Silver Nuggets -
The R&D Management Newsletter.
To subscribe to future issues, click
here and insert the ID "nuggets" in the address. |
|
|