Is Friction Dragging Down Your New
Product Results?
| Growing companies often
encounter friction between individuals and groups that need to be working
together. This isn’t just a management headache. It also impacts
business performance, especially when the friction impacts new product
development. In this article, John Farnbach and Mary Callahan exchange
ideas about causes of and solutions to organizational misalignment in new
product programs. |
August, 2005
| We are frequently
asked about dealing with organizational friction. Here’s a typical problem:
"My company seems to have a lot of friction surrounding new products, but
I can’t put my finger on what’s causing it. As the company has grown, this
has become a real headache. How can I fix a problem like this?"
John:
"Friction" surrounding new product
development is very common in growing companies, and executives need to
address it, even though it may seem vague and hard to pin down. In addition
to causing management headaches, the problem has a negative impact on new
product ROI because it leads to unclear product definitions, erratic development
schedules, and clumsy releases.
Product innovation is a critical business
operation that spans the whole enterprise, applying resources and skills
from across the company to convert technical and market knowledge into
economically valuable products. As the company grows, interactions among
people and groups become more important than the skills of a few individuals.
The friction that executives sense indicates that something is wrong with
these interactions.
Mary:
This kind of friction is a symptom
of lack of alignment among functions or individuals in the company -- like
a car with its wheels going in different directions. The first step on
the road to alignment is to be sure that everybody has a clear and common
understanding of company goals. |
|
Executives
can use financial models to set goals and define improvements that are
realistic and mutually consistent.
|
In a growing
company, some relative old-timers may still be guided by out-dated goals;
newer employees may be making assumptions based on companies where they
used to work. In addition, many small company CEOs have shared information
about company goals only in informal and somewhat piecemeal ways.
So, the friction and the headaches
show that it is time to get to work on a straightforward statement of company
goals that is understandable and meaningful to all. |
John:
A good way to set goals is to start
with a model of new product financials. The model is based on an appropriate
measure of ROI, such as new revenue generated per dollar of development
cost. Two additional inputs -- product life span, and R&D funding as
a percent of sales -- are enough to calculate long term growth in revenue,
gross margin, and net profit with a simple spreadsheet.
A high level model like this isn’t
precise, but it shows the quantitative links among the key parameters of
a new product program. For example, it shows how much growth will improve
by increasing R&D funding and what ROI would be needed to meet growth
targets. It will also give an ROI threshold value for selecting new product
opportunities.
Mary:
Thinking of critical business operations
as horizontal, company-wide flows in which the interfaces are as important
as the functions is a great habit for a growing company to adopt early
and keep forever. When product innovation drives company success, the entire
executive team needs to be actively involved in building the NPD model
and owning the result.
The benefits of the "executive team
approach" are significant. It brings together and dynamically balances
the interests, expertise, viewpoints, and learning experiences from all
the knowledge domains in your company. (Be sure that those who interact
with the "external world" of suppliers, customers, markets, channels, etc.
inject those viewpoints into the mix.) Every time the executive team works
together like this, members increase their understanding of each other’s
mental models, improving their ability to collaborate.
Specifically, the collaborative
work of developing the product innovation model will help all members of
the executive team understand that NPD is not about just the engineering
function. This is the first step toward connecting – and aligning -- the
work done in every function to earn superior innovation ROI. |
John:
After company goals are
set using a high level financial model, it’s important to align implementation
with the goals. Many decisions and tradeoffs during the life of a product
impact financial results, and differing perspectives are a common source
of friction. Typical tradeoffs might involve sacrificing manufacturing
margins to release early or delaying the release to add a product feature.
Project financial models not only reduce disagreement on questions like
these, but they also keep the resolutions closely aligned with company
goals. |
Enlist
key employees at all levels of the organization to support the change,
particularly in demonstrating a positive attitude.
|
| Project level
models have to be consistent with the high level ones – ROI metrics should
be identical, and product revenue profiles should reflect those used in
the high level models. Project models should cover the whole life span
of the product and include all the factors that impact ROI significantly,
such as manufacturing and support costs and sales life.
Many companies use project level financial
models as business cases to evaluate new opportunities, but they don’t
revisit the model after the development starts. By keeping the models current
and using them to compare tradeoffs throughout the product’s life, everyone
involved with the project can make more consistent decisions with better
financial results.
Mary:
A set of financial and project models
produced and owned by the entire executive team is a good beginning, but
it can only bring the desired results when it is communicated throughout
the organization -- another leadership task for the executive team. Executives
must prepare and deliver messages to both motivate every employee and help
them understand corporate goals, particularly how they impact decisions
and change the way work is done.
Implementing new practices that support
enterprise-wide thinking and workflow is a significant change effort, even
for a company whose culture is already open, participatory, and flexible.
If the existing culture won’t support the new practices, the change effort
will be more complex. In any case, don’t underestimate the planning, coaching,
and training needed to accomplish this step, and don’t miss the opportunity
to incorporate employee and stakeholder feedback.
Executives have three very effective
tools to use in implementing necessary organizational changes. First, key
employees at all levels of the organization should be enlisted to support
the change, particularly in demonstrating a positive attitude. Second,
the company should provide plenty of classroom and on-the-job training,
so that all employees know how to do their jobs in new ways. Finally, company
leaders must be sure that formal and informal reward systems both motivate
and reinforce the behavior that not only brings the company into alignment,
but also drives it to higher profits. |
|
What's your opinion?
We're happy to discuss these
ideas with you. Email us by clicking this link
and inserting the ID "info" in the address. (This helps us avoid SPAM.)
This article was published
in Silver Nuggets -
The R&D Management Newsletter.
To subscribe to future issues, click
here and insert the ID "nuggets" in the address. |
|
|